Client Successes

• KM&M’s Clients Prevail on Their Motion to Dismiss an Employee’s Multimillion Dollar Lawsuit for Commissions and Bonuses

• New York Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Racial Discrimination and Harassment Claims
  
  
• Federal Court Ends Trial and Dismisses Benefits, Wrongful Termination Claims of Terminated Engineer
  
  
• Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Sarbanes-Oxley Complaint Against KM&M Client
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Lawsuit by Terminated Stagehand
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Discriminatory Pay Claim Against KM&M Client
  
  
• KM&M Client Prevails in Jury Trial in Ten Year Old Employment Discrimination Case
  
  
• KM&M Client Compels Deposition of EEOC Witness
  
  
• Arbitrator Rejects Retaliation Claim Against KM&M Client
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Age and Race Discrimination and Retaliation Lawsuit Filed by Laid Off Union Employee
  
  
• KM&M Helps The NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt Successfully Resolve Wrongful Termination Claims by Co-Founder
  
  
• KM&M Client Prevails In Two-Plaintiff Whistleblower/Constructive Discharge Arbitration
  
  
• KM&M Client Prevails In Multi-Plaintiff Wage Claim under California's Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Age, Race Discrimination Lawsuit by Laid Off Employee
  
  
• Federal District Court Rejects Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, and Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of KM&M Client in ERISA Suit
  
  
• Plaintiff Withdraws Emotional Distress and Disability Discrimination Claims Against KM&M's Client Rather Than Release Medical Information
  
  
• Federal Court Grants KM&M's Motion for Summary Judgment in Broad Discrimination Lawsuit Filed by Former Viacom Employee; Plaintiff's Counsel May Be Sanctioned For Refusing To Withdraw Baseless Claims
  
  
• Arbitrator Sustains Discharge of Cellular Technician: Misconduct, not Status as Chief Union Steward, Was the Cause
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Harassment Complaint: Affirmative Defense Based on Employer Policies Prevails
  
  
• KM&M Wins Another Round in Litigation War Waged By Client's Former In-House Immigration Counsel
  
  
• Federal Court Grants KM&M's Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Lawsuit Filed Against St. John's University by Former Head Coach of Women's Basketball
  
  
• KM&M Client Wins Summary Judgment, Dismissing California Family Leave Claims
  
  
• New York Supreme Court Dismisses Employee's Complaint Against KM&M Client Seeking $20 Million In Allegedly Unpaid Compensation
  
  
• Summary Judgment for KM&M Client on Breach of Contract Claim
  
  
• KM&M Arbitration Victory Confirms that Grievant's Time to File Begins to Run When She First Learns of the Challenged Employment Decision
  
  
• Summary Judgment for KM&M Client in Refusal to Rehire Case
  
  
• Arbitrator Sustains Suspension of Shop Steward for Promoting Refusal of Overtime Work
  
  
• New York Appellate Court Rejects Breach Of Contract Claim Brought By Former In-House Attorney Against KM&M Client
  
  
• California Court Rules Wrongful Termination Claim Has No Merit
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Race Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Against KM&M Client
  
  
• Third Circuit Sustains Summary Judgment in Favor of KM&M Client in Discrimination/Retaliation Suit
  
  
• Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination, Contract, and Misrepresentation Claims Against KM&M Client; Plaintiff's Counsel Sanctioned
  
  
• Second Circuit Confirms That Former St. John's University Graduate Assistant Has No Viable Federal Claims
  
  
• Suspended Attorney's Effort to Evade New York's Employment at Will Doctrine Successfully Opposed by KM&M
  
  
• California Court of Appeal Affirms Dismissal of Sexual Harassment Case
  
  
• Federal Court Grants KM&M's Motion to Dismiss ADA Complaint
  
  
• KM&M Wins Summary Judgment on Behalf of Alleged "Joint Employer"