On June 22, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision that substantially enhances the legal protection for employees who complain about discrimination or harassment in the workplace. Burlington Northern...
Category: Employment Discrimination
May 01, 2006
Employment Discrimination
California Supreme Court Rejects Friends Sexual Harassment Claim
The Supreme Court’s Decision On April 20, 2006, the California Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated ruling in Lyle v. Warner Bros., known as “the Friends case.” In a unanimous decision, the high court found...
Apr 17, 2006
Employment Discrimination
District Court Limits Scope of Title VII Transsexual Sex Discrimination Claims
On March 31, 2006, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision making it more difficult for transsexuals to pursue sex discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964...
Employers who are federal contractors and subcontractors are required to take affirmative action to ensure equal employment opportunity in their employment processes. As part of that process, government contractors are...
Aug 31, 2005
Employment Discrimination
Refusal To Terminate An Employee Based On Her Looks Supports Retaliation Claim Under California Law
On August 11, 2005, the California Supreme Court ruled that an employee could state a claim for retaliation under the Fair Employment Housing Act (“FEHA”) based on the employee’s refusal to comply with a supervisor’s...
Jul 25, 2005
Employment Discrimination
California Supreme Court Rules that Sexual Favoritism Can Constitute A Hostile Work Environment
On July 18, 2005, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously that supervisors’ sexual relationships with subordinates may create a hostile work environment for co-workers, even if those co-workers were not directly...
Apr 05, 2005
Employment Discrimination
Supreme Court Rules That Disparate Impact Claims May Be Brought Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
On March 31, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an individual protected by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) (i.e., an employee, former employee, or job applicant who is age forty or older)...
Feb 08, 2005
Employment Discrimination
Ninth Circuit Holds that Casino’s Rule Requiring Female Bartender to Wear Full Makeup Is Not Sex Discrimination
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently decided that a good-grooming rule issued by Harrah’s Casino to its employees, which requires female bartenders to wear makeup, does not violate Title VII’s...
Nov 08, 2004
Employment Discrimination
Second Circuit Eases Burden For Proving Hostile Work Environment Claim
Employers frequently have been able to mount a successful defense to hostile work environment sexual harassment claims by demonstrating that both male and female workers were exposed to the same conduct underlying the claim....
Oct 26, 2004
Employment Discrimination
Second Circuit Limits Scope of Disability in “Interacting with Others”
An individual is considered to be “disabled,” and therefore protected under the Americans With Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), if he or she suffers from a physical or mental impairment that substantially...